• Football
  • Baseball
  • Basketball
The 5x5: Sports Loud and Clear.. Read It Now!

Gear Up For The 2009 NBA Playoffs

ESPN = Worthless

May 31st, 2009 at 11:06 am
Cavaliers vs. Magic

I’ve railed in the past against ESPN for picking precious little athletes or even whole teams to dote upon: Red Sox vs. Yankees, Peyton Manning, Brett Favre, Tom Brady, etc. But this morning’s ESPN.com homepage was enough to make me choke back a little of last night’s dinner.

I haven’t been following the NBA playoffs too closely. I know the story is the NBA wanted LeBron vs. Kobe, and the refs were laughably close to throwing on Cleveland Jerseys to make it happen. And frankly, it wouldn’t surprise me given the NBA’s refereeing history.

So this morning, after the Magic upset the Cavs to fulfill the dark horse role for the Playoffs, ESPN puts up a giant photo of LeBron pouting. The “killer” headline: “Sand Castle: What Can LeBron Do?”.

Here’s what LeBron can do. He can go home with his losing team and watch the rest of the Playoffs on TV while he throws talcum powder in the air.

Ultimately, we watch sports to see who wins. Who overcame the other team. Who was better? That’s why we follow it. That’s what keeps us interested. That’s why we get passionate about our teams and our favorite players.

Not for ESPN. And they’ve done it before: constantly cutting to Peyton Manning during the Pats vs. Giants Super Bowl; endless coverage of Brett Favre long after no one cares any more. It’s favoritism. It’s cult of personality.

It’s puke.

That’s not to say there are not stories to be followed on losing teams. In fact, I do think LeBron’s loss is a story worthy of an interview. But he’s not front page material with four stories behind him. And the Magic get a single video following LeBron.

I picked the Cavs to win in 5. I was wrong. The Magic are the better team and I like them to beat the Lakers too.

Here’s my prediction. ESPN will do a week’s worth of stories on LeBron losing, and what it means for the Cavs and an endless loop of “LeShot”. They might even intercut it with Favre highlights.

It’s a complete disdain for what makes sports great. It’s pandering to focus groups and ratings books. Maybe you guys should focus on opening more “ESPN Zones” and quit pretending you’re interested in reporting on games, because you’ve officially become the MTV of sports. You’re the veneer of the concept you pioneered. . . and you’re laughable.

As a sports fan, I’m completely disgusted.

ESPN=worthless.

Comments
  • greg
    ESPN hasn't been good in roughly 5 years. There was a time you could count on punctual and factual sports news from them. you could wake up in the morning and know you'd get an hour of sports with some entertaining one sentence intro; Highlights numbers and facts but that was it no fluff and no Schitzo camera shots and edits. They also used to have people who knew what they were talking about now they have people like...err...Steve Phillips. . Stewart Scott should retire or jump of a bridge, although i prefer the later, but if BACK BACK BACK chris berman and the painful john miller still get air time I'm sure we'll have mr. scott for about 20 years too many. ESPN is to sports what MTV is to music you hit it dead on.
  • Joe
    And this thing with Lebron not shaking hands shouldn't be made into such a big deal. We should be talking about how the Magic really dominated the Cavs this series, but ESPN is all about Lebron. I would have loved to see Lebron v Kobe in the Finals, but it didn't happen so lets focus on the teams/players who are still playing basketball.
  • David
    It is sad, it seems the more money that is involved the worse it gets in sports.
  • Oberyn
    I agree with you completely. Despite the Cavs losing in 6 games, ESPN's focus is still on LeBron. It's as if they're fulfilling some sort of contractual obligation which requires them to devote a certain percentage of their progamming to "King James". It's nauseating.
blog comments powered by Disqus